Words used to be very important. Especially when they were put on a piece of paper. It seems hard for us to comprehend, but the number of people able to read and write was severely limited for centuries. Now it is very commonplace and the illiterate are on the outer. All for the best, you might say. But let us just stop and think about it for a while today.
When reading and writing were scarce, people took a lot of care with what they wrote. There was no rush to publish, so writers took a lot of time and care to craft their work for their audience, which was a small and well-educated section of society. The result of this was some of the best literature of all time. In fact, there would probably be a distinct correlation between the rise of literacy and the decline of standards in literatures. With the rise of the internet and the proliferation of published literature, the standard of authors has lowered dramatically. I know it is somewhat ironic that I am bemoaning this on a blog, one of the chief architects of this, but nonetheless I feel that it should be said.
The audience is less of a problem. Forms of literature have been tailored to public interest for millennia. Many of the famous Greek and Roman poets wrote their works for recital, rather than to be read. Media such as theatre and the spoken word managed to bridge the gap between author and public, allowing anyone access to high forms of literature. The works of Homer began as an oral tradition and their influence has spread throughout the Western world since. Shakespeare was amazingly popular amongst a population with very low literacy levels. Great authors have tailored their works to whomever they wanted, depending on their preference- whether they wanted to be accessible to everyone and widely appreciated, or accessible by few and appreciated for that very fact. The latter struck me when I read the poems of Andrew Marvell, a metaphysical poet. His poems were not meant for general consumption, on the contrary their content and crafting was of such a high level that only the most educated could properly appreciate them. Obviously this idea appealed to him as a writer: quality of fans over quantity I guess.
Nowadays, when money comes into the equation, it's all about quantity. People who want to make their lives as authors- in the past it was more of a hobby than anything else- need to make as much money as they can. This tends to compromise the quality of writing somewhat; authors like Stephen King churn out book after book, in very systematic styles. The recent success of Dan Brown has seen the rise and rise of the 'historical mystery' genre, copied and repeated by more and more authors ad nauseam. One feels that the faster the volume of writing increases, the faster we will exhaust the extent to which literature can go, to the detriment of us all. Of course when I say faster there, I mean more quickly. But that would not sound nice.
So in the end, if this piece is to have any sort of point or structure, I will return to the idea of why I am writing this. I am writing this for me, not for you. If there is a you! I am not seeking any specific target audience with this, in fact I do not expect anyone to read this! So even one is a bonus. It is merely a medium to get some thoughts off my brain and onto print. If you have read this, I hope you don't feel you have wasted your time. And just maybe you'll peruse the page again some day. Till next time, that's me for now!
Seeing as you are writing merely for yourself, I won't bother complimenting your work or even tell you to 'keep it up!'. So I'll cut straight to it. With regards to your point about the quality of literature declining, you're probably right. Though I'd say that in the past, only the best and brightest wrote, yet now it's anyone who can manage to string together something of a coherent sentence (myself being included in the latter category - my train of thought is an inarticulate jumble at best which you can probably tell from my sentence structure... I welcome any advice). I guess its this idea that leads me to the question: why do people feel the need to share their thoughts? As you say, even Marvell wrote to be appreciated. So is it the hope that someone out there will read what we write and connect with it?
ReplyDeleteAnyway, for what it's worth I read what you wrote and will probably continue to read more. I don't expect you to be overly excited by fan mail/comments - or to even care too much about my opinion. But maybe the mutual indifference for caring what others think will interest you enough to reply...
Regards
That is indeed a very good question, one which cuts right to the heart of the current facebook/twitter etc phenomenon- why do people share all this stuff about themselves and do they really think people care? Obviously there are greater and lesser extents to which people engage in this, and that may be an indication that it does depend of personality. I think in the end it comes down to human nature- some people just like the idea of other people caring about them and what they have to say. I must admit that since I wrote this, I have strayed somewhat from my intentions and now do want people to read what I say- and for that I am delighted you have read this and commented. I guess we humans are all inherently selfish, yours truly included! But despite that I do value others' opinions and am not so arrogant to be indifferent! So feel free to comment, I appreciate it!
ReplyDeleteI had to come back and try my luck at this again..no cat this time!
ReplyDeleteI have noticed that since I have been following your blog, you have started writing less on the blog and more on your Twitter and Facebook! Could it be because you recieve more comments and interact with more people through Twitter and Facebook?
Blogging seems to be an outlet for older adults (30+) to share their interest in family, hobbies, religious beliefs..etc. and takes more time to manage, while the other two are more for the younger generation who seem to have less time on their hands, yet still want their audiance to keep up with what is happening in their lives.
My question is:
Are you an introvert or an extrovert type of person?
I have noticed just through my (friends) list on Facebook, that most of my (friends) are extrovets who always have been and always will be the "center of attention", while the introverts are the ones who "LURK" in the shadows with the occasional comment and are usually the ones who hit the "LIKE" button the most.
Do I care whether or not people comment on my blog or follow me...NO, because I am an introvert who panics sometimes when I get a comment and don't know how to respond to it no matter how simple it may be!
Blogging is my PROZAC of choice, it relaxes me when I am stressed out and offers me an outlet to keep my brain functioning, by reading other blogs that have similar interest as mine and sharing my amateur photography skills with others who are in the same catagory.
I find Facebook and Twitter useless and the only reason I have a Facebook account is because certain family members requested it to keep in touch with me, which they can't seem to do either way because I am merely a face in their "FRIENDS" list!